Didn’t find the necessary information? Make an appointment for a consultation with oral surgeon Ihor Oleksandrovych Osadchy.
Dental implantation with bone augmentation
Bone augmentation for dental implantation is becoming increasingly popular. Many clinics in Ukraine and Kyiv position the procedure as a breakthrough in dentistry. However, augmentation (bone grafting) surgeries have been performed for a long time and are not a new technology. The predictability and success rate of such operations cannot be called high. Moreover, there are alternative technologies – dental implantation with insufficient bone tissue is possible even without osteoplasty. Therefore, we recommend that patients study the issue in detail before making a decision.

Bone augmentation surgeries have the general name “osteoplasty” and are used not only in maxillofacial surgery but also in orthopedics, traumatology, and plastic surgery. Thus, bone grafting for implants is not the only task of osteoplasty.
However, it should be noted that the majority of osteoplasty procedures in Kyiv are performed specifically for the purpose of bone augmentation for dental implantation.
Dental implantation is a surgical procedure during which an artificial tooth root is placed into the patient’s bone. Thus, the success of implantation directly depends on the condition of the patient’s bone and the volume of bone availability.
In some cases, due to various reasons, the patient experiences thinning of the jawbone – a deficit of bone availability, which significantly complicates or makes implantation impossible.
Indications for osteoplasty
| Indication | Description |
| Insufficient bone volume | May be caused by resorption (destruction) of bone tissue after tooth extraction, prolonged absence of a tooth, etc. |
| Bone defects | Surgical interventions, injuries, and various diseases can provoke bone defects in the prospective implant placement area |
| Post-traumatic conditions | May occur as a result of surgical intervention (e.g., tumor removal) |
| Bone resorption | Periodontal disease (inflammation of the periodontium) often leads to bone tissue destruction |
| Correction of failed implantation | If previous implant placement attempts were unsuccessful, bone augmentation for the implant may be required |
Contraindications for osteoplasty
| Contraindication | Description |
| Systemic diseases | Certain systemic diseases, such as uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune diseases, or blood disorders, may make bone augmentation for dental implantation impossible |
| Bone pathologies | Bone pathologies (tumors, infectious diseases, etc.) are also contraindications for osteoplasty |
| Age restrictions | With age, the body’s ability to heal and regenerate, including bone tissue, decreases. Therefore, an implant with bone augmentation may not be available for elderly patients, but this is individual and depends on the physiology of the specific patient |
| Pregnancy | Surgical procedures may be postponed for fetal safety reasons |
| Smoking and alcohol | Tobacco and alcohol use affects the bone tissue healing process and also imposes restrictions on bone augmentation before implantation |

Extensive experience
Стаж работы челюстно-лицевой хирурга 38 лет, из них 8 лет — работа дежурным врачом отделения острой травмы.

Number of surgeries
Over 2,000 successful surgeries in the field of maxillofacial surgery.

Quality of work
Thanks to a thorough approach in diagnostics and treatment planning for each clinical case, we achieve a minimal number of complications.
To augment bone for an implant, it is necessary to transplant bone material into the future implantation zone. There are many materials used as transplant grafts, but the three most popular remain: autogenous, allogeneic, and synthetic materials.
| Description | Advantages | Limitations |
|
Source The source for obtaining autogenous bone tissue is the patient’s own bones. Typically, the harvesting is done from a nearby area (the chin). Extraction procedure Surgical intervention and extraction of bone tissue in blocks or chips. Material preparation The bone tissue is processed to remove soft tissues and, if necessary, ground down |
High compatibility Since the material is taken from the patient’s own body, there is minimal risk of rejection or allergic reactions. Activity Autogenous materials usually contain living cells and growth factors, which promotes the natural healing process and osseointegration. Availability Material can be harvested from various bones of the patient |
Additional trauma The bone material extraction procedure involves performing additional surgical intervention |
Of all transplants, autogenous (autograft) works best, but for the success of the operation, it is very important to perform the material harvesting correctly. For example, if harvesting is done in blocks, a piezotome with irrigation must be used to prevent overheating and tissue necrosis. When harvesting material with a scraper in the retromolar space (behind the wisdom teeth), tissue necrosis due to friction is also possible.
For those patients who decide to undergo osteoplasty, we recommend not rushing and considering alternative methods, as well as discussing with the doctor not only the operation but also the material harvesting. Osteosynthesis and the possibility of further implantation directly depend on the quality of the transplant.
| Description | Advantages | Limitations |
|
Source The source for obtaining allogeneic bone tissue is donors (often posthumously). Material preparation Allogeneic materials undergo special processing, including dehydration, disinfection, and other steps to remove residual cells and prevent the possibility of infection transmission |
Volume Allogeneic materials can be available in large volumes, which is especially important when treating extensive defects. Number of interventions Unlike autogenous materials, the use of allogeneic materials does not require additional surgery for tissue extraction from the patient |
Rejection Despite processing, there is still a risk of rejection. Infection There remains a risk of infection from donor material |
Bone augmentation during dental implantation can be performed using not only organic but also synthetic material.
- Bioceramic
Include hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, and other ceramic compounds that mimic the mineral components of bone tissue.
- Polymeric
Polylactide, polyglycolide, and other biodegradable polymers that provide structural support and gradual replacement of bone tissue.
- Combined
May contain combinations of bioceramic and polymeric components to achieve optimal properties.
Synthetic material
| Description | Advantages | Limitations |
|
Source Synthetic materials are created using various technologies, including molding, sintering, extrusion, and 3D printing, to create a structure as close as possible to the physical and chemical characteristics of bone tissue |
No additional surgery Unlike autogenous materials, the use of synthetic materials does not require additional surgical procedures for tissue extraction from the patient. Controlled structure The structure and properties of synthetic materials are carefully controlled |
Individual reaction Some patients may show individual sensitivity to synthetic materials. Healing duration The speed of healing and integration with bone tissue may vary depending on the type of synthetic material |
Yes, the area from which the autogenous material was harvested for osteoplasty will recover and there will be no significant defect. Healthy bone regenerates fairly quickly – within a few weeks, but much depends on the volume of material harvested.
Bone augmentation during implantation is not always necessary. In the vast majority of cases, patients have a small but still sufficient volume of bone availability for implant placement. In particular, this refers to the possibility of placing short implants of the “plateau” system.
If osteoplasty was unsuccessful and bone augmentation proved insufficient, the implant may become mobile, and sometimes it may indeed fall out of the bone or even collapse into the maxillary sinus.
Provided the osteoplasty operation was successful, implant placement can be performed approximately six months later.
During clinical examinations, it is determined whether dental implantation with bone augmentation is necessary and possible. Such examinations may require not only an X-ray but also a CT scan or 3D scanning.
If the patient and doctor have decided to resort to osteoplasty, the procedure will take place either in two main stages: bone augmentation followed by dental implantation, or in a single stage.
This means that both bone material transplantation and artificial root placement occur during a single surgical intervention. It is believed that such implantation with insufficient bone tissue has advantages in the form of saving the patient’s time and fewer surgical interventions.
However, single-stage implantation with bone augmentation is associated with significant risks. Even a top-level specialist cannot guarantee that the material will integrate during osteoplasty, let alone integrate in the full, predicted volume. Implant placement in this case reduces the likelihood of success, especially with a significant bone tissue deficit.
Thus, the patient not only loses time and money but also receives additional trauma, with the deterioration of an already imperfect clinical picture.
This involves first augmenting the bone for the implant, and then placing the artificial root. The advantages of separating the procedure into osteoplasty and implantation proper include:
- more time for healing;
- the ability to ensure that the osteosynthesis process has begun and there is no rejection;
- a higher probability of success even in cases of pronounced bone deficit.
At “Dr. Osadchiy’s Dental Clinic” we urge all patients to take a responsible approach to health matters. Sometimes saving time and money can result in greater losses. Therefore, if the patient and doctor have decided to proceed with bone augmentation for the implant, it is better to opt for a staged approach.
Osteoplasty is a fairly complex surgical procedure, so the cost of bone augmentation for implantation will predictably be quite high, regardless of which clinic performs the operation. In Kyiv, the cost of such procedures is approximately 20 thousand hryvnias.
It should be remembered that an important factor affecting the cost of bone augmentation for dental implantation is the type of material. We recommend choosing autogenous material, but one should not think that using one’s own material for transplantation will significantly reduce costs. After all, material harvesting and preparation are expensive procedures.
To the cost of bone augmentation for dental implantation, one must also add the cost of the implant itself and the services for its placement, since patients are not interested in intermediate results, and the goal of all procedures is to obtain beautiful teeth that are indistinguishable from natural ones.
Not all patients with a small volume of bone availability are candidates for osteoplasty. Moreover, bone augmentation is not possible in all cases. However, this does not mean that the patient will remain without teeth. At “Dr. Osadchiy’s Dental Clinic” we have both the equipment that allows proper material harvesting and the experience that enables us to perform osteoplasty operations. We use our knowledge exclusively as intended, and more precisely: we perform operations only when there are direct medical indications.
Trying to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions and their negative consequences, we recommend that patients take advantage of an alternative to bone augmentation – short implants of the “plateau” system.
A standard implant measuring 8 to 12 mm can be placed in bone at least 12 mm high and at least 6 mm wide. According to the protocol, the length of the screw implant (artificial root) should equal the height of the crown that will be placed on it. However, the short implants of the “plateau” system that we use can support a crown that is three times larger than the length of the artificial root. For example, a crown 10 mm high can be placed on an implant only 4 mm long. The reliability of fixation of “plateau” system implants is achieved by their greater surface area, not their length.
Thus, where bone availability would be insufficient for placing a screw implant and osteoplasty would be required, short Ultrashort Plateau Root Form Implants can be placed.